Intraoperative monitoring for safety of total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Controversies on the safety of the cement application between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been existing for decades. The purpose of this study was to observe the changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and oxygen pressure (PaO(2)) during cemented THA, and to evaluate the intraoperative safety of using the third-generation cementing technique and investigate whether the intraoperative risk is higher in acute femoral neck fracture patients than non-traumatic patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Forty-two patients who underwent cemented THA between November 2005 and September 2007 were prospectively included in this study. The third-generation cementing technique as vacuum mixing and pulsatile lavage was used strictly. The MAP and HR were monitored and documented during each operation. Blood gas analysis was performed at exposure, cup implantation, stem implantation and wound closure. MAP, HR and PaO(2) were compared between pre- and post-cement application. Comparisons of MAP, HR and PaO(2) between patients with acute femoral neck fracture and non-traumatic patients were performed as well.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>No intraoperative cardiopulmonary complication occurred in these cases. No obvious changes were observed in MAP, HR and PaO(2) after cement application. There was no significant difference in MAP, HR and PaO(2) between acute femoral fracture patients (18 patients) and non-traumatic patients (24 patients).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The results of this study suggested that the invasive blood pressure monitoring and blood gas analysis are essential for patients undergoing cemented THA, especially for patients with femoral neck fracture. The third-generation cementing technique is safe to use in THA.</p>

Efficacy of Betahistine Mesilate combined with Flunarizine Hydrochloride for treating tinnitus / 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To determine whether Betahistine mesilate is effective in treating tinnitus.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial was used in our study. The study group consisted of 60 adult patients who consulted our outpatient clinic complaining of subjective tinnitus, excluded objective tinnitus and the patients who had tinnitus caused by obvious diseases, such as outer and middle ear diseases. Thirty patients were given Betahistine mesilate and Flunarizine Hydrochloride as an experimental group, 30 patients were given Vitamin B6 and Flunarizine Hydrochloride as a control group. After a week of treatment the efficacy of the medicines in two groups was observed. Tinnitus questionnaire was performed before the treatment, and pure tone audiogram, tinnitus pitch and loudness matching were performed both in the beginning and at the end of the treatment.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Completion of treatment, tinnitus loudness matching assessment showed that the efficacy of the Betahistine mesilate group was better then the control group. The efficacy of treatment was respectively 65.5% by per protocol (PP) and 63.3% by intend to treat (ITT) in the Betahistine mesilate group and 39.3% by PP and 36.7% by ITT in the control group. The difference of tinnitus loudness improvement rate between the experimental group and control group was statistically significant. But the subjective tinnitus improvement rate showed no difference between two groups. There were not serious side effects in the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Betahistine mesilate can be a choice for tinnitus treatment clinically. Further studies of larger series and placebo-controlled trial are needed.</p>

Relationship between sample size and variation of means for personal noise exposure in weaving workers / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the relationship between sample size and variance of means for personal noise exposure in weaving workers as to contributing evidence for establishing personal noise exposure measurement guideline.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A personal noise exposure measurement database from a group of weaving workers was used in the randomized re-sampling data analysis. The sampling cases were one number selecting from one to fifteen at each randomized re-sampling procedure. The randomized re-sampling was one thousand times from original personal noise exposure measurement database to get one thousands of re-sampling database. One thousands of L(Aeq.8 h) mean were calculated by re-sampling databases. The variation of randomized re-sampling means was analyzed for different re-sampling numbers.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The change for narrow trend of maximum, minimum, 95 percent number, 5 percent number of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was faster when randomized re-sampling number was smaller in variation vs randomized re-sampling number curve analysis. After that, the change for narrow trend of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was smooth for increasing the randomized re-sampling numbers. The 95% - 5% of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was about half for randomized re-sampling four cases (3.30 dB) vs one case (7.40 dB), and about one third for seven cases (2.44 dB), and about one fourth for eleven cases (1.85 dB).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The sample size in personal noise exposure measurement guideline could be selected from four to eleven.</p>

Comparison of efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and open hemorrhoidectomy / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the results of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and open hemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A standard questionnaire was given to all patients after PPH or open hemorrhoidectomy from March 2001 to March 2004. In combination with proctological examination, the results including symptoms relief and recurrence were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 184 effective questionnaires, including 96 cases in PPH group and 88 in open hemorrhoidectomy group. PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy both relieved prolapse (92.7% vs 96.8%, P=0.282), bleeding (91% vs 81%, P=0.241) and pain (91.7% vs 91.5%, P=0.977). There were no statistical differences in the overall complication rate (30.2% and 29.5%, P=0.923) and recurrence rate (21.8% vs 20.5%, P=0.814) between the two groups. The overall satisfactory degree was 87.5% in PPH group and 84.8% in open hemorrhoidectomy group (P=0.218).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>PPH is a safe and effective option for prolapsed hemorrhoids compared with open hemorrhoidectomy.</p>

Measurement of personal noise exposure in a cold rolling mill / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To measure and evaluate the personal noise exposure of cold rolling mill workers by using noise dosimeter.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>According to job category and work type, all workers were divided into 11 groups. 3 to 5 day shift (8:00 to 16:00) workers from each group were selected as subjects for personal noise exposure measurement. SH-126 dosimeters were worn by each subject and collect noise data by a phone fix at collar. All subjects were asked to take notes about their working activities when they were wearing SH-126 dosimeters. Each worker's L(A)(eq) of 8 hours, geometric mean and range of each group were computed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were many noise sources in the workshop. Recorded data showed that noise exposure of cold rolling mill was unstable. The varieties of personal noise levels were quite large. Among 53 workers, the highest noise exposure level was 100.0 dB (A), the lowest was 81.2 dB (A); the highest work type was of the foreside welders [94.20 dB (A)], and the lowest was of the straight-cutters [89.02 dB (A)]; quality checkers had the biggest rang [16.3 dB (A)], and primary rolling workers had the lest [2.3 dB (A)].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Noise exposure of all the 11 groups were more than 85 dB (A). Noise protection of these workers should be improved. It suggested that measuring personal noise exposure individually with dosimeters might obtain the noise exposure level more integrally in the complicated environment.</p>

Water exposure modes and times of different populations in mountainous schistosomiasis endemic areas near Qionghai lake / 中华预防医学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate water exposure modes and times of different populations in mountainous schistosomiasis endemic areas and to inform about the control strategies.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>All 1054 residents from populations around Qionghai Lake were randomly sampled according to occupation for a retrospective questionnaire survey in November 2001. Each individual was interviewed for his/her mode, frequency, and duration of water exposure occurring between April and October 2001.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The average exposure times and intensity were higher in farmers (median: 16 - 18 min/day and 2.41 - 2.5, respectively) who grow rice, tobacco, and vegetables than others (median: 3.74 - 7.39 min/day and 0.81 - 1.52, respectively); exposure frequency was found highest in farmers (median: 2.04 times/day) in all occupations; schoolchildren had low exposure frequency and times, but very high exposure intensity (median 2.34). Between April and June it is an agriculturally busy season, that is also a peak season of water exposure of adults. Schoolchildren's water exposure peaks on July and August, mainly due to playing water and swimming. Exposure times and intensities were higher in females than in males.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Water exposure modes, times, and intensities of different populations were different in mountainous schistosomiasis endemic areas of Xichang. Between April and June should be the peak infection season of adults who are engaging in agricultural activities, while July to August should be the peak infection season for schoolchildren with non-agricultural activities.</p>

Multi-institutional randomized controlled clinical trial on China made 4-demethoxydaunokrubicin (IDA) in the treatment of acute leukemia / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IDA (Haizheng Parmacy, China) in the treatment of acute leukemia.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A multi-institutional single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out. A total of 155 newly diagnosed patients with AML and ALL were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one was given IDA (n = 77) and the other given zevodas (Pharnacia & Upjohn, n = 78) for comparison.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients enrolled in this trial were eligible for assessment of side effects, and 129 patients for evaluation of overall response rate. In patients treated with IDA vs zevodas, the overall response rate (OR) was 78.1% vs 76.9%, CR was 68.8% vs 67.7%; in AML patients, OR was 82.4% vs 71.8%, and CR was 76.5% vs 64.1%; in ALL patients, OR was 80.0% vs 81.8%, and CR was 68.0% vs 68.2%. There was no sitatistically significant difference in hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The efficacy of IDA in the treatment of acute leukemia is comparable to that of zevodas. Both have similar toxic side effects.</p>